What Happens When You’ve Lost That Loving Feeling?

By Nathan Chua | One Life Only Counseling Services

Have you ever looked at your partner and wondered why you no longer feel the same way you once did? Perhaps you used to look forward to seeing each other, enjoyed spending time together, and experienced excitement, affection, and closeness. But somewhere along the way, those feelings began to fade. You may still care about your partner, but the romantic feelings that once seemed so natural are no longer there. And so you begin to wonder: Have I fallen out of love?

In my years of counseling couples, I have encountered many who struggle with this question. One partner may say, “I care about my spouse, but I don’t feel that romantic love anymore.” For some, the absence of loving feelings becomes evidence that the relationship has run its course. But is that necessarily true? What if the disappearance of those feelings does not automatically mean the end of love? What if the context in which those feelings once flourished has gradually changed?

Love Doesn’t Exist in a Vacuum

We often think of love as something we possess. We either have it or we don’t. When we first fall in love, the feelings can be so powerful that we hardly have to think about them. We naturally want to spend time together, show affection, and do things that make our partner happy. But relationships do not remain in the same circumstances forever. There are responsibilities, financial pressures, children, careers, disagreements, disappointments, and sometimes years of unresolved conflicts. Gradually, couples may stop doing the things that once brought them closer. They talk less, spend less meaningful time together, and become increasingly preoccupied with responsibilities and problems.

Eventually, one or both partners begin to notice that something is missing. The loving feelings are no longer what they used to be. But perhaps we are asking the wrong question when we immediately conclude that love has disappeared. Instead of asking only whether we still love our partner, we might also ask what has happened to the circumstances and interactions that once nurtured those feelings.

From a contextual perspective, feelings do not exist independently of our experiences. They are influenced by what happens around us, how we interact with others, and the histories we bring into those interactions. Love is no exception.

When Love Becomes a Waiting Game

This is where couples can become caught in a particularly difficult trap. Imagine someone who tells themselves, “I don’t feel love anymore, so why should I behave lovingly?” Or perhaps, “I’ll start being affectionate again when I feel something.”

At first glance, this sounds reasonable. After all, we do not want to pretend to feel something we do not feel. But there is a potential problem with this way of thinking. What if waiting for loving feelings to return is actually contributing to their continued absence?

In Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), there is a concept called cognitive fusion. This refers to becoming so entangled with our thoughts that we begin treating them as rules we must obey, rather than as thoughts that may or may not be useful in a particular situation.

Consider the rule: “I must feel love before I can behave lovingly.”

When we become fused with this rule, we may stop doing the very things that once helped nurture our relationship. We stop initiating conversations, making time for each other, expressing appreciation, or showing small gestures of care. As these interactions become less frequent, opportunities for affection and connection may diminish as well. Eventually, we find ourselves saying, “See? I really don’t love my partner anymore.”

Without realizing it, we may have helped create the very conditions that reinforce our original conclusion.

This is how the loss of loving feelings can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. We wait for the feelings to return before changing our behavior, while our unchanged behavior may be contributing to the conditions that keep those feelings absent.

Does This Mean We Should Force Ourselves to Love?

Certainly not. I am not suggesting that people should force themselves to feel something they do not feel, pretend to be affectionate, or engage in unwanted intimacy. That would miss the point entirely.

The question I would invite someone to consider is this: If this relationship still matters to you, are there things you would be willing to do to nurture it, even when the loving feelings are not currently present?

Perhaps it means spending meaningful time together again, listening more attentively, expressing appreciation, or becoming more responsive to each other’s needs. Not because we are pretending to be in love, but because we are choosing to engage in behaviors that serve something important to us.

In ACT, this is related to committed action: choosing behaviors that are consistent with our values, even when our feelings are not necessarily cooperating. We do not have to wait for a particular emotional experience before doing something meaningful.

Of course, there is no guarantee that loving feelings will return. And the purpose of these actions should not simply be to manufacture feelings. Rather, they allow us to participate more deliberately in creating the kind of relationship we value, while remaining open to whatever feelings may follow.

Understanding the Patterns That Keep Couples Stuck

In Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT), we examine how partners become caught in patterns of interaction that maintain their difficulties. For example, one partner may withdraw because they no longer feel close. The other experiences this withdrawal as rejection and becomes increasingly critical or demanding. The first partner then withdraws even further. Before long, both are responding to each other in ways that make their relationship increasingly difficult.

Rather than immediately deciding who is to blame, we try to understand the pattern. What sensitivities are involved? What circumstances contribute to their difficulties? How do the partners respond to each other, and what consequences do those responses produce?

This shift in perspective can be important. Instead of viewing the problem simply as one partner’s lack of love, we begin to recognize how both partners may be participating in a pattern that makes closeness increasingly difficult.

Understanding the pattern does not automatically resolve it, but it may create opportunities for both partners to respond differently. And when their interactions begin to change, the context of their relationship may change as well.

What If the Commitment Is No Longer There?

There is, however, another important consideration. Does the person still want to remain in the relationship?

Losing loving feelings and losing commitment are not necessarily the same thing. Someone may say, “I don’t feel the way I used to, but I still want to see whether we can make this relationship work.” That is quite different from someone who has already decided that they no longer wish to continue.

Sometimes people are uncertain. They may care about their partner but no longer know whether they want to remain together. These differences matter because the goals of couples counseling should take into account what each partner wants and is willing to work toward.

For some couples, counseling may focus on improving the relationship. For others, the immediate task may be clarifying whether they wish to continue. And when separation has become the chosen direction, counseling may help the partners navigate that process more constructively.

Commitment matters, but it should not become another obligation imposed on someone. Nor should nurturing a relationship mean tolerating abuse, coercion, or threats to one’s safety.

Perhaps We Have Been Waiting for the Wrong Thing

When someone says they have fallen out of love, I do not immediately assume that the relationship is over. I become curious about what has happened. What has changed? What interactions have become less frequent? What disappointments remain unresolved? What rules might the partners be following that keep them from responding differently?

Perhaps the question is not simply, “Do I still love my partner?” Perhaps another question worth asking is, “What has happened to the context in which our love once flourished?”

And if the relationship still matters, there is another question worth considering:

“Am I waiting for my feelings to change before I do anything differently, when doing something differently might help create the conditions for those feelings to return?”

We cannot command ourselves to feel love. But we may still have choices about how we nurture relationships that matter to us.

Sometimes, the feelings we are waiting for may be influenced by the very actions we have stopped taking.

And perhaps that is something worth considering before concluding that love is gone.


Nathan Chua is a counselor at One Life Only Counseling Services in Quezon City, Philippines. His work draws from contextual behavioral approaches, including Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).

When Breakups Teach Us How to Break Up, Not How to Love

By Nathan Chua

We’ve often heard people say:

“I’ve learned so much from my past relationships. Now I know what to look for.”

But here’s a question worth asking.

What exactly did they learn?

Did they learn how to sustain a relationship? Or did they simply learn how to avoid another painful one?

Because breaking up doesn’t necessarily teach us how to stay together.

Sometimes, it simply teaches us how to break up better.

Think about it.

After a painful breakup, we often develop a list of things to avoid.

“I’ll never date someone like that again.”

“I won’t tolerate that kind of behavior anymore.”

“The moment I see a red flag, I’m out.”

And we call that learning from experience.

But what if some of those lessons actually make it more difficult for us to sustain our next relationship?

Let me explain.

When a relationship ends painfully, leaving can bring tremendous relief.

The arguments stop. The disappointments end. The anxiety subsides.

And naturally, we learn something from that experience.

We learn that leaving can make the pain go away.

Now, there’s nothing necessarily wrong with leaving. Sometimes, especially in harmful or abusive relationships, leaving is precisely what we need to do.

But here’s the interesting part.

What brings us relief isn’t necessarily what teaches us how to build something better.

If every disagreement reminds us of a previous painful relationship, we might become quicker to withdraw.

If we were betrayed before, we might become increasingly suspicious.

If our previous partner disappointed us, we might develop stricter expectations of the next one.

Without realizing it, we may become very good at protecting ourselves from relationships, rather than learning how to participate in them.

And there’s a difference.

You see, sustaining a relationship requires skills that breaking up doesn’t necessarily teach us.

It requires learning how to navigate differences.

How to have difficult conversations.

How to respond when our partner disappoints us.

How to recognize that the person we love will sometimes behave in ways we don’t particularly like.

And perhaps most importantly, how to distinguish between difficulties we can work through and situations we genuinely need to leave.

Unfortunately, we sometimes approach new relationships with old rules.

“If someone really loves me, they should know what I need.”

“If we argue too much, we’re probably incompatible.”

“If I feel unhappy, maybe I’m with the wrong person.”

But are these rules helping us build the relationship we want?

Or are they simply helping us avoid the pain we’ve experienced before?

Here’s something else to consider.

When we evaluate a potential partner, we often ask:

“Is this person right for me?”

But perhaps we should also ask:

“Am I learning how to become a better partner in this relationship?”

Because relationships aren’t sustained simply by finding someone who meets our expectations.

They’re also sustained by what two people learn to do together, especially when things become difficult.

Of course, not every relationship should be saved.

And staying together isn’t necessarily a measure of success.

Sometimes, ending a relationship is the most sensible and compassionate decision.

But leaving and staying require different skills.

And learning one doesn’t automatically teach us the other.

So the next time someone says they’ve learned a lot from their previous relationships, perhaps there’s another question worth asking.

Did those experiences teach you how to love better?

Or did they simply teach you how to leave sooner?

Because the real lesson from a breakup may not be about finding someone who will never disappoint us.

It may be about learning how to respond differently when disappointment inevitably comes.

And perhaps that’s where learning how to love actually begins.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/7Frd8RFfaRuAiB1eaC1VCc?si=j76OjTd7TmKMbQCzN04TWQ

Is Love About Finding the Right Person–or Creating the Right Context?

By Nathan Chua

Have you ever noticed how often we promise ourselves, “When I finally find the right person, everything will be different”?

Movies tell us that love should come naturally. Social media tells us that happy couples simply fit together. Relationship advice often teaches us to find “the one.”

But if that’s true, why do so many loving couples end up feeling lonely, frustrated, or disconnected?

As a counsellor, I’ve sat with couples who genuinely love each other. They don’t want to hurt one another. Yet they keep repeating the same painful arguments.

The husband thinks, “She’s impossible to please.”

The wife thinks, “He doesn’t care about me anymore.”

Both are trying to explain the relationship by looking at the other person’s character.

But what if they’re asking the wrong question?

One of the biggest lessons I’ve learned from modern behavioural science is that behaviour always happens in a context.

A stressed husband is different from a relaxed husband.

A sleep-deprived mother is different from a well-rested mother.

A couple arguing after months of financial pressure is different from that same couple enjoying a quiet holiday together.

The context changes the behaviour.

That doesn’t excuse hurtful actions.

But it helps explain them.

And understanding is often the first step toward change.

This is the heart of my new book, Love, Contextually.

Rather than asking whether someone is a good partner or a bad partner, the book asks a different question:

“What is happening around this behaviour that makes it more likely?”

That simple shift changes everything.

Instead of endlessly blaming one another, couples begin solving problems together.

Instead of trying to win arguments, they begin understanding each other’s worlds.

Instead of chasing the fantasy of a perfect relationship, they learn how real love actually grows.

Love isn’t the absence of conflict.

Love is learning how to move toward each other even when conflict is present.

That’s why the book talks about acceptance and change.

Some things in every relationship should change.

Others never will.

Wisdom is knowing the difference.

If you’ve ever felt discouraged because your relationship isn’t turning out the way you imagined, I hope this book gives you hope.

Not because it promises easy answers.

But because it offers a different way of seeing.

Sometimes our relationships don’t change because we haven’t changed the lens through which we see them.

If you’d like to learn more, Love, Contextually is now available in paperback and Kindle on Amazon.

For a personalized signed copy, order directly through One Life Only by calling +63 917 886 5433 (LIFE) or emailing info@onelifeonly.net.

If you think someone you care about would benefit from this perspective, please share this video or article with them.

I’m Nathaniel Chua, also known by my pen name Starfly Chua, counsellor, author, and speaker.

Helping people understand themselves, their relationships, and society—for better people, better relationships, and a better country.

Listen on Spotify:

https://open.spotify.com/episode/7pjLS32N96TXN272NiTE1Q?si=wvvyIJKgSgiwIvUE9LifFA

@onelifeonlycounseling

Is Love About Finding the Right Person–or Creating the Right Context? Is love really about finding the right person — or creating the right context? Sometimes it isn’t only about who we love. Timing, communication, expectations, emotional safety, and the world we create together can change everything. That’s one of the central ideas behind my book, Love, Contextually. So what do you think: right person, right context, or both? LoveContextually Relationships Love Psychology RelationshipTok Dating Communication

♬ original sound – One Life Only Counseling – One Life Only Counseling

Chronic Infidelity? What if Your Urges Were Your Friend?

by Nathan Chua

No, I’m not suggesting you follow your urges. I’m suggesting you stop treating them like an enemy that must be eliminated. Ironically, that battle is often what keeps people trapped. What if your urges could become a signal—an opportunity to choose the kind of partner you want to be instead of the person your impulses demand?

One of the most frustrating experiences in therapy is working with someone who sincerely wants to change, yet keeps repeating the same behaviour. Few examples are more painful than chronic infidelity.

Many people assume the problem is simple. If only the attraction disappeared. If only the temptation went away. If only they stopped thinking about other people, then they would finally become faithful.

Unfortunately, years of trying usually prove otherwise.

They have prayed. They have made promises. They have sworn that “this time will be different.” They have tried distracting themselves, suppressing their thoughts, avoiding attractive people, and shaming themselves after every lapse.

Yet the urges return.

Perhaps the problem is not that they have failed to eliminate their urges.

Perhaps the problem is that they have made urge elimination the goal.

The Elevator Analogy

Imagine someone with a severe fear of elevators.

Their entire life becomes organised around avoiding elevators. They climb twenty flights of stairs. They arrive exhausted for meetings. They choose hotels based on whether they have elevators. They even turn down jobs located in high-rise buildings.

For years they believe:

“Once my fear disappears, then I can use elevators.”

But exposure therapy turns this assumption upside down.

The goal is never to eliminate fear.

The goal is to help people ride the elevator while fear is present.

Ironically, when people stop making fear reduction their primary mission, fear often becomes much less powerful over time.

The fear may still visit.

But it no longer controls where they go.

The Same Principle Applies to Chronic Infidelity

Many people caught in repeated patterns of infidelity hold an invisible rule:

“I can only be a loving partner if I stop feeling attracted to other people.”

That sounds reasonable.

It is also nearly impossible.

Attraction is part of being human. Noticing another attractive person says very little about whether someone loves their partner.

The real question is not:

“Can I eliminate attraction?”

The better question is:

“Can I experience attraction without allowing it to determine my behaviour?”

Those are two completely different goals.

The Trap of Fighting the Urge

When people desperately try to eliminate an urge, something interesting happens.

The urge becomes the centre of attention.

Every attractive stranger becomes a test.

Every intrusive thought becomes evidence that something is wrong.

Every temptation feels like an emergency.

Life slowly becomes organised around managing urges.

Ironically, this often strengthens them.

The struggle itself becomes part of the problem.

Acceptance Is Not Permission

This is where many people misunderstand acceptance.

Acceptance does not mean approving of infidelity.

It does not mean giving yourself permission to cheat.

Acceptance simply means making room for uncomfortable thoughts, feelings, and bodily sensations without treating them as commands.

“I notice attraction.”

“I notice excitement.”

“I notice guilt.”

“I notice the urge to send a message.”

None of these experiences force a behaviour.

They are experiences—not instructions.

A Different Kind of Pause

When urges arise, people often experience tunnel vision.

Their attention narrows until only one thing seems to exist.

The attractive person.

The excitement.

The fantasy.

The possibility.

Therapy creates a pause.

Not a pause to force yourself to be faithful.

Not a pause to prove your self-control.

Simply a pause to notice the whole picture.

“I notice excitement.”

“I notice fear.”

“I notice guilt.”

“I notice that I care deeply about my partner.”

“I notice the kind of person I want to become.”

From that wider perspective, behaviour is no longer completely automatic.

There is no passing or failing this exercise.

The goal is simply to weaken the automatic link between urge and action.

That pause can happen before sending a message.

While chatting online.

Before agreeing to meet.

Even during a date.

At any point in the behavioural chain, awareness creates the possibility of choice.

Living According to Values, Not Urges

People often tell me,

“I’m trying not to have these urges.”

I understand why.

But perhaps there is a more helpful goal.

Instead of asking,

“How do I stop wanting this?”

Try asking,

“What kind of partner do I want to be, even while these urges are present?”

That question changes everything.

Instead of living in constant battle with your own mind, you begin living toward something that matters.

Faithfulness becomes more than the absence of temptation.

It becomes the repeated practice of choosing your values in the presence of temptation.

The Real Freedom

Freedom is not reaching the point where unwanted thoughts never appear.

Freedom is discovering that they no longer have the final say.

Just as courage is not the absence of fear but moving forward despite fear, faithfulness is not the absence of attraction but repeatedly choosing the relationship you want to build despite attraction.

The person with elevator phobia does not wait for fear to disappear before entering the elevator.

Likewise, someone struggling with chronic infidelity may not have to wait for temptation to disappear before becoming the partner they aspire to be.

Real change begins the moment we stop asking our minds for permission to live according to our values.

Recovery doesn’t begin when the urges disappear. Recovery begins the moment you stop running from them.

If you or your relationship is struggling with repeated infidelity, One Life Only Counseling Services offers evidence-based counseling online and in person. Contact us at +63 917 886 5433 (LIFE) or info@onelifeonly.net to schedule an appointment.

If you wish to book online, please click here.

For books written by Nathan Chua under the pen name Starfly Chua, click here.

@onelifeonlycounseling

Chronic Infidelity: What if Your Urges Were Your Friend? What if the problem isn’t your urges? Many people trapped in repeated infidelity spend years fighting their thoughts and desires—only to feel even more trapped. A different path begins by learning to notice your urges without letting them decide your next move. Infidelity Relationships Cheating ACT AcceptanceAndCommitmentTherapy ContextualBehavioralScience Psychology MentalHealth CouplesTherapy RelationshipAdvice#fyp #foryou #counselingphilippines #onelifeonlycounseling #counseling #PsychologyVlog #ThinkDeeper

♬ original sound – One Life Only Counseling – One Life Only Counseling

Coping With Anger

Anger is a feeling.

It is not the problem.

Feelings are neither good nor bad, right nor wrong.

The question is not whether anger should be there.

The question is what happens when we follow it.

Can we express our anger with dignity?

Can we use it in the service of what matters?

It is never about perfection.

It is about becoming more aware of the consequences of our responses and choosing the path that works best.

When We Treat Ourselves and Others Like Things

The problem is not that we describe people.
The problem begins when our descriptions become explanations.
Personality becomes a thing.
Intelligence becomes a thing.
Diagnosis becomes a thing.
Attachment becomes a thing.
Before we know it, we stop asking what happened and start assuming we know what someone is.
We begin treating ourselves and others as things to be fixed rather than people to be understood.

Ano Ba Ang Love?

faKung ang love ay hindi pagiging bulag sa reality,
at hindi rin simpleng feeling na nawawala sa unang disappointment,
ano nga ba ito?
Love is a context where two people can build a meaningful life together.
Hindi ito dahilan para manatili sa takot, pananakit, o abuse.
Pero hindi rin ito isang bagay na basta na lang iniiwan dahil naiinis tayo, nadidismaya, o nahihirapan sa ating differences.
Every meaningful relationship will have moments when the distance between two people feels hard to cross.
Hindi kawalan ng mga moments na iyon ang love.
Love is creating a life where crossing that distance remains worthwhile.
Isang buhay na binubuo ng tiwala, respeto, at shared purpose.
Hindi perpektong buhay.
Hindi madaling buhay.
Pero isang buhay na maipagmamalaki nating ibahagi.
At isang buhay na may kakayahang magdagdag ng kaunting kabutihan sa mundong ating ginagalawan.

Is Love Blind?

We readily acknowledge chemistry on a first date because little is at stake.

But when the stakes become higher, we often stop asking whether a relationship is workable and start asking how to make it work at any cost.

Love requires effort.

But effort alone cannot turn every context into one where a meaningful life can be built.

Why Avoiding Toxic People Doesn’t Always Work

Most advice says: “Just avoid toxic people.”

But what if you can’t?

What if that person is your boss, your spouse, your parent, or someone you can’t simply walk away from?

This is where most advice breaks down.

And this is where people start to feel stuck, confused, or even guilty.

If this is your situation, you don’t have to figure it out alone.

👉 Book a confidential session here.

We offer counseling sessions focused on helping you respond more effectively to complex relationship situations — without pressure, judgment, or one-size-fits-all advice.

The Problem with Oversimplified Advice

Advice like “avoid toxic people” works well on social media because it’s clear, direct, and emotionally satisfying. But it can also create guilt and confusion when people find that they can’t actually follow it.

You might start asking yourself:

“What’s wrong with me?”
“Why can’t I just walk away?”
“Am I weak for staying?”

In many cases, the issue is not weakness — it’s context.

A More Workable Question

Instead of asking:

“Should I avoid this person?”

A more helpful question is:

“What is workable in this situation?”

This shifts the focus from rigid rules to practical, real-life solutions.

What You Can Do Instead

Depending on your situation, more workable options may include:

Setting clear but realistic boundaries
Limiting exposure rather than cutting off completely
Changing how you respond in difficult interactions
Building support systems outside the relationship
Gradually creating options if leaving is your long-term goal

Avoidance is sometimes the right choice — but it’s not the only choice.

A More Flexible Way to Think About Relationships

From a contextual behavioral perspective, the goal is not to follow rules perfectly, but to respond in ways that actually improve your life over time.

Some relationships require distance.
Some require boundaries.
Some require patience and strategy.

And some, eventually, may require letting go.

But the key is this:

The best choice is the one that is workable in your real-life context — not just what sounds good in theory.

Watch the Full Video

Watch the full discussion above to explore this idea in more detail and learn how to apply it to your own relationships.

If this is something you’re going through, you’re not alone.

👉👉 Book a session here to talk this through