When Breakups Teach Us How to Break Up, Not How to Love

By Nathan Chua

We’ve often heard people say:

“I’ve learned so much from my past relationships. Now I know what to look for.”

But here’s a question worth asking.

What exactly did they learn?

Did they learn how to sustain a relationship? Or did they simply learn how to avoid another painful one?

Because breaking up doesn’t necessarily teach us how to stay together.

Sometimes, it simply teaches us how to break up better.

Think about it.

After a painful breakup, we often develop a list of things to avoid.

“I’ll never date someone like that again.”

“I won’t tolerate that kind of behavior anymore.”

“The moment I see a red flag, I’m out.”

And we call that learning from experience.

But what if some of those lessons actually make it more difficult for us to sustain our next relationship?

Let me explain.

When a relationship ends painfully, leaving can bring tremendous relief.

The arguments stop. The disappointments end. The anxiety subsides.

And naturally, we learn something from that experience.

We learn that leaving can make the pain go away.

Now, there’s nothing necessarily wrong with leaving. Sometimes, especially in harmful or abusive relationships, leaving is precisely what we need to do.

But here’s the interesting part.

What brings us relief isn’t necessarily what teaches us how to build something better.

If every disagreement reminds us of a previous painful relationship, we might become quicker to withdraw.

If we were betrayed before, we might become increasingly suspicious.

If our previous partner disappointed us, we might develop stricter expectations of the next one.

Without realizing it, we may become very good at protecting ourselves from relationships, rather than learning how to participate in them.

And there’s a difference.

You see, sustaining a relationship requires skills that breaking up doesn’t necessarily teach us.

It requires learning how to navigate differences.

How to have difficult conversations.

How to respond when our partner disappoints us.

How to recognize that the person we love will sometimes behave in ways we don’t particularly like.

And perhaps most importantly, how to distinguish between difficulties we can work through and situations we genuinely need to leave.

Unfortunately, we sometimes approach new relationships with old rules.

“If someone really loves me, they should know what I need.”

“If we argue too much, we’re probably incompatible.”

“If I feel unhappy, maybe I’m with the wrong person.”

But are these rules helping us build the relationship we want?

Or are they simply helping us avoid the pain we’ve experienced before?

Here’s something else to consider.

When we evaluate a potential partner, we often ask:

“Is this person right for me?”

But perhaps we should also ask:

“Am I learning how to become a better partner in this relationship?”

Because relationships aren’t sustained simply by finding someone who meets our expectations.

They’re also sustained by what two people learn to do together, especially when things become difficult.

Of course, not every relationship should be saved.

And staying together isn’t necessarily a measure of success.

Sometimes, ending a relationship is the most sensible and compassionate decision.

But leaving and staying require different skills.

And learning one doesn’t automatically teach us the other.

So the next time someone says they’ve learned a lot from their previous relationships, perhaps there’s another question worth asking.

Did those experiences teach you how to love better?

Or did they simply teach you how to leave sooner?

Because the real lesson from a breakup may not be about finding someone who will never disappoint us.

It may be about learning how to respond differently when disappointment inevitably comes.

And perhaps that’s where learning how to love actually begins.

The Values and The Logic of Living

Values are not conclusions reached by logic.
They are directions of living that organize logic.
Values supply the direction, logic provides the route.

Coping With Anger

Anger is a feeling.

It is not the problem.

Feelings are neither good nor bad, right nor wrong.

The question is not whether anger should be there.

The question is what happens when we follow it.

Can we express our anger with dignity?

Can we use it in the service of what matters?

It is never about perfection.

It is about becoming more aware of the consequences of our responses and choosing the path that works best.

When We Treat Ourselves and Others Like Things

The problem is not that we describe people.
The problem begins when our descriptions become explanations.
Personality becomes a thing.
Intelligence becomes a thing.
Diagnosis becomes a thing.
Attachment becomes a thing.
Before we know it, we stop asking what happened and start assuming we know what someone is.
We begin treating ourselves and others as things to be fixed rather than people to be understood.

What does it mean to be perfect?

The word perfect comes from the Latin perfectus.
It originally meant complete.
Not flawless.
Not superior.
Not better than others.
Complete.
The problem-solving mind spends much of its time convincing us that something is missing.
Yet before we were successful or unsuccessful, admired or rejected, confident or insecure, we were already human.
Perhaps perfection is not becoming someone else.
Perhaps it is living fully as the person you already are.
You are not an unfinished human waiting for permission to exist.

Why Avoiding Toxic People Doesn’t Always Work

Most advice says: “Just avoid toxic people.”

But what if you can’t?

What if that person is your boss, your spouse, your parent, or someone you can’t simply walk away from?

This is where most advice breaks down.

And this is where people start to feel stuck, confused, or even guilty.

If this is your situation, you don’t have to figure it out alone.

👉 Book a confidential session here.

We offer counseling sessions focused on helping you respond more effectively to complex relationship situations — without pressure, judgment, or one-size-fits-all advice.

The Problem with Oversimplified Advice

Advice like “avoid toxic people” works well on social media because it’s clear, direct, and emotionally satisfying. But it can also create guilt and confusion when people find that they can’t actually follow it.

You might start asking yourself:

“What’s wrong with me?”
“Why can’t I just walk away?”
“Am I weak for staying?”

In many cases, the issue is not weakness — it’s context.

A More Workable Question

Instead of asking:

“Should I avoid this person?”

A more helpful question is:

“What is workable in this situation?”

This shifts the focus from rigid rules to practical, real-life solutions.

What You Can Do Instead

Depending on your situation, more workable options may include:

Setting clear but realistic boundaries
Limiting exposure rather than cutting off completely
Changing how you respond in difficult interactions
Building support systems outside the relationship
Gradually creating options if leaving is your long-term goal

Avoidance is sometimes the right choice — but it’s not the only choice.

A More Flexible Way to Think About Relationships

From a contextual behavioral perspective, the goal is not to follow rules perfectly, but to respond in ways that actually improve your life over time.

Some relationships require distance.
Some require boundaries.
Some require patience and strategy.

And some, eventually, may require letting go.

But the key is this:

The best choice is the one that is workable in your real-life context — not just what sounds good in theory.

Watch the Full Video

Watch the full discussion above to explore this idea in more detail and learn how to apply it to your own relationships.

If this is something you’re going through, you’re not alone.

👉👉 Book a session here to talk this through

From Participant to Contributor: A Guest Segment for a PESI ACT Training

I was recently invited by Jacob Martinez, a licensed professional counselor from Wisconsin, to contribute to an international ACT training series in collaboration with PESI.

For many years, I’ve been on the other side of these trainings—as a participant, learning from international clinicians and trying to make sense of how these ideas apply in real-world settings.

This invitation marks a meaningful shift for me: from learning within that space to contributing to it.

In this 45-minute segment, I discuss a core distinction in contextual behavioral science:

Functional coherence vs essential coherence.

In simple terms:

Essential coherence asks: “Is this true? What is this really?”
Functional coherence asks: “Does this work? What does this lead to?”

Most of us—including many clinicians—are trained to think in essential terms: labels, traits, diagnoses, and fixed explanations about “what a person is.”

ACT takes a different approach.

Instead of focusing on what thoughts or emotions are, it focuses on what they do—how they function in context, and whether they help a person move toward a meaningful and workable life.

This shift may seem subtle, but it has wide implications—not just for therapy, but for how we understand relationships, culture, and social issues.

I’m sharing this here in the hope of making these ideas more accessible, especially within the Filipino context, where moral and label-based thinking are often emphasized.

Because the real shift is not just learning new techniques.

It’s learning to see behavior differently.

▶️ Watch the full 45-minute training here:

https://spotifycreators-web.app.link/e/bZHvvPXmV1b

 

Solving Corruption Psychologically…Contextually!

@onelifeonlycounseling

Solving Corruption Psychologically…Contextually! Why does corruption survive no matter who we elect… or how many new rules we create? In this video, I explain corruption through a behavioral and cultural lens — not politics. No partisanship. No personalities. Just the psychology and context behind why our system keeps producing the same problems. Here’s the truth: 🔸 Low-trust societies accumulate corruption — even without evil people. 🔸 More rules often create more bottlenecks… and more shortcuts. 🔸 Culture can block good governance even when plans are smart. 🔸 Real change begins with context — not fear, not shame, not moralizing. If you want a fresh, science-based explanation of why corruption persists in the Philippines — and what actually builds cooperation — watch this. Better People, Better Country. But better people come from better contexts.

♬ original sound – One Life Only Counseling – One Life Only Counseling

What to do when jealousy strikes your relationship?

@onelifeonlycounseling

What to do when jealousy strikes your relationship? Jealousy is one of the most painful emotions in a relationship. It can make one partner shrink their world out of fear… and push the other partner into panic, defensiveness, and exhaustion. In this video, counselor Nathan Chua (One Life Only Counseling Services) explains jealousy through a contextual behavioral lens (ACT + IBCT) — showing why jealousy narrows our world, how fear takes over, and how partners can respond from values instead of panic. You’ll learn: ❤️ What jealousy is really trying to protect ❤️ Why interrogation, control, and defensiveness make things worse ❤️ How to use the “friend experiment” to guide healthier choices ❤️ How the wrongly-accused metaphor helps partners act with dignity ❤️ Why relationships improve when love — not fear — takes the lead Remember: No relationship gets healthier by obeying fear. It gets healthier when partners act from the kind of love they want to stand for… even when fear is in the room. #OneLifeOnlyCounseling NathanielChua ACTtherapy IBCT JealousyInRelationships RelationshipAdvice ContextMatters LoveAndFear MentalHealthAwareness PsychologicalFlexibility CouplesTherapy#fyp #counselingphilippines #foryou #PsychologyVlog #counseling #onelifeonlycounseling

♬ original sound – One Life Only Counseling – One Life Only Counseling

Jealousy is one of the most painful emotions in a relationship.
It can make one partner shrink their world out of fear…
and push the other partner into panic, defensiveness, and exhaustion.

In this video, counselor Nathan Chua (One Life Only Counseling Services) explains jealousy through a contextual behavioral lens (ACT + IBCT) — showing why jealousy narrows our world, how fear takes over, and how partners can respond from values instead of panic.

You’ll learn:

❤️ What jealousy is really trying to protect
❤️ Why interrogation, control, and defensiveness make things worse
❤️ How to use the “friend experiment” to guide healthier choices
❤️ How the wrongly-accused metaphor helps partners act with dignity
❤️ Why relationships improve when love — not fear — takes the lead

Remember:
No relationship gets healthier by obeying fear.
It gets healthier when partners act from the kind of love they want to stand for…
even when fear is in the room.

#OneLifeOnlyCounseling #NathanielChua
#ACTtherapy #IBCT #JealousyInRelationships
#RelationshipAdvice #ContextMatters
#LoveAndFear #MentalHealthAwareness
#PsychologicalFlexibility #CouplesTherapy