What Happens When You’ve Lost That Loving Feeling?

By Nathan Chua | One Life Only Counseling Services

Have you ever looked at your partner and wondered why you no longer feel the same way you once did? Perhaps you used to look forward to seeing each other, enjoyed spending time together, and experienced excitement, affection, and closeness. But somewhere along the way, those feelings began to fade. You may still care about your partner, but the romantic feelings that once seemed so natural are no longer there. And so you begin to wonder: Have I fallen out of love?

In my years of counseling couples, I have encountered many who struggle with this question. One partner may say, “I care about my spouse, but I don’t feel that romantic love anymore.” For some, the absence of loving feelings becomes evidence that the relationship has run its course. But is that necessarily true? What if the disappearance of those feelings does not automatically mean the end of love? What if the context in which those feelings once flourished has gradually changed?

Love Doesn’t Exist in a Vacuum

We often think of love as something we possess. We either have it or we don’t. When we first fall in love, the feelings can be so powerful that we hardly have to think about them. We naturally want to spend time together, show affection, and do things that make our partner happy. But relationships do not remain in the same circumstances forever. There are responsibilities, financial pressures, children, careers, disagreements, disappointments, and sometimes years of unresolved conflicts. Gradually, couples may stop doing the things that once brought them closer. They talk less, spend less meaningful time together, and become increasingly preoccupied with responsibilities and problems.

Eventually, one or both partners begin to notice that something is missing. The loving feelings are no longer what they used to be. But perhaps we are asking the wrong question when we immediately conclude that love has disappeared. Instead of asking only whether we still love our partner, we might also ask what has happened to the circumstances and interactions that once nurtured those feelings.

From a contextual perspective, feelings do not exist independently of our experiences. They are influenced by what happens around us, how we interact with others, and the histories we bring into those interactions. Love is no exception.

When Love Becomes a Waiting Game

This is where couples can become caught in a particularly difficult trap. Imagine someone who tells themselves, “I don’t feel love anymore, so why should I behave lovingly?” Or perhaps, “I’ll start being affectionate again when I feel something.”

At first glance, this sounds reasonable. After all, we do not want to pretend to feel something we do not feel. But there is a potential problem with this way of thinking. What if waiting for loving feelings to return is actually contributing to their continued absence?

In Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), there is a concept called cognitive fusion. This refers to becoming so entangled with our thoughts that we begin treating them as rules we must obey, rather than as thoughts that may or may not be useful in a particular situation.

Consider the rule: “I must feel love before I can behave lovingly.”

When we become fused with this rule, we may stop doing the very things that once helped nurture our relationship. We stop initiating conversations, making time for each other, expressing appreciation, or showing small gestures of care. As these interactions become less frequent, opportunities for affection and connection may diminish as well. Eventually, we find ourselves saying, “See? I really don’t love my partner anymore.”

Without realizing it, we may have helped create the very conditions that reinforce our original conclusion.

This is how the loss of loving feelings can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. We wait for the feelings to return before changing our behavior, while our unchanged behavior may be contributing to the conditions that keep those feelings absent.

Does This Mean We Should Force Ourselves to Love?

Certainly not. I am not suggesting that people should force themselves to feel something they do not feel, pretend to be affectionate, or engage in unwanted intimacy. That would miss the point entirely.

The question I would invite someone to consider is this: If this relationship still matters to you, are there things you would be willing to do to nurture it, even when the loving feelings are not currently present?

Perhaps it means spending meaningful time together again, listening more attentively, expressing appreciation, or becoming more responsive to each other’s needs. Not because we are pretending to be in love, but because we are choosing to engage in behaviors that serve something important to us.

In ACT, this is related to committed action: choosing behaviors that are consistent with our values, even when our feelings are not necessarily cooperating. We do not have to wait for a particular emotional experience before doing something meaningful.

Of course, there is no guarantee that loving feelings will return. And the purpose of these actions should not simply be to manufacture feelings. Rather, they allow us to participate more deliberately in creating the kind of relationship we value, while remaining open to whatever feelings may follow.

Understanding the Patterns That Keep Couples Stuck

In Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT), we examine how partners become caught in patterns of interaction that maintain their difficulties. For example, one partner may withdraw because they no longer feel close. The other experiences this withdrawal as rejection and becomes increasingly critical or demanding. The first partner then withdraws even further. Before long, both are responding to each other in ways that make their relationship increasingly difficult.

Rather than immediately deciding who is to blame, we try to understand the pattern. What sensitivities are involved? What circumstances contribute to their difficulties? How do the partners respond to each other, and what consequences do those responses produce?

This shift in perspective can be important. Instead of viewing the problem simply as one partner’s lack of love, we begin to recognize how both partners may be participating in a pattern that makes closeness increasingly difficult.

Understanding the pattern does not automatically resolve it, but it may create opportunities for both partners to respond differently. And when their interactions begin to change, the context of their relationship may change as well.

What If the Commitment Is No Longer There?

There is, however, another important consideration. Does the person still want to remain in the relationship?

Losing loving feelings and losing commitment are not necessarily the same thing. Someone may say, “I don’t feel the way I used to, but I still want to see whether we can make this relationship work.” That is quite different from someone who has already decided that they no longer wish to continue.

Sometimes people are uncertain. They may care about their partner but no longer know whether they want to remain together. These differences matter because the goals of couples counseling should take into account what each partner wants and is willing to work toward.

For some couples, counseling may focus on improving the relationship. For others, the immediate task may be clarifying whether they wish to continue. And when separation has become the chosen direction, counseling may help the partners navigate that process more constructively.

Commitment matters, but it should not become another obligation imposed on someone. Nor should nurturing a relationship mean tolerating abuse, coercion, or threats to one’s safety.

Perhaps We Have Been Waiting for the Wrong Thing

When someone says they have fallen out of love, I do not immediately assume that the relationship is over. I become curious about what has happened. What has changed? What interactions have become less frequent? What disappointments remain unresolved? What rules might the partners be following that keep them from responding differently?

Perhaps the question is not simply, “Do I still love my partner?” Perhaps another question worth asking is, “What has happened to the context in which our love once flourished?”

And if the relationship still matters, there is another question worth considering:

“Am I waiting for my feelings to change before I do anything differently, when doing something differently might help create the conditions for those feelings to return?”

We cannot command ourselves to feel love. But we may still have choices about how we nurture relationships that matter to us.

Sometimes, the feelings we are waiting for may be influenced by the very actions we have stopped taking.

And perhaps that is something worth considering before concluding that love is gone.


Nathan Chua is a counselor at One Life Only Counseling Services in Quezon City, Philippines. His work draws from contextual behavioral approaches, including Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).

Chronic Infidelity? What if Your Urges Were Your Friend?

by Nathan Chua

No, I’m not suggesting you follow your urges. I’m suggesting you stop treating them like an enemy that must be eliminated. Ironically, that battle is often what keeps people trapped. What if your urges could become a signal—an opportunity to choose the kind of partner you want to be instead of the person your impulses demand?

One of the most frustrating experiences in therapy is working with someone who sincerely wants to change, yet keeps repeating the same behaviour. Few examples are more painful than chronic infidelity.

Many people assume the problem is simple. If only the attraction disappeared. If only the temptation went away. If only they stopped thinking about other people, then they would finally become faithful.

Unfortunately, years of trying usually prove otherwise.

They have prayed. They have made promises. They have sworn that “this time will be different.” They have tried distracting themselves, suppressing their thoughts, avoiding attractive people, and shaming themselves after every lapse.

Yet the urges return.

Perhaps the problem is not that they have failed to eliminate their urges.

Perhaps the problem is that they have made urge elimination the goal.

The Elevator Analogy

Imagine someone with a severe fear of elevators.

Their entire life becomes organised around avoiding elevators. They climb twenty flights of stairs. They arrive exhausted for meetings. They choose hotels based on whether they have elevators. They even turn down jobs located in high-rise buildings.

For years they believe:

“Once my fear disappears, then I can use elevators.”

But exposure therapy turns this assumption upside down.

The goal is never to eliminate fear.

The goal is to help people ride the elevator while fear is present.

Ironically, when people stop making fear reduction their primary mission, fear often becomes much less powerful over time.

The fear may still visit.

But it no longer controls where they go.

The Same Principle Applies to Chronic Infidelity

Many people caught in repeated patterns of infidelity hold an invisible rule:

“I can only be a loving partner if I stop feeling attracted to other people.”

That sounds reasonable.

It is also nearly impossible.

Attraction is part of being human. Noticing another attractive person says very little about whether someone loves their partner.

The real question is not:

“Can I eliminate attraction?”

The better question is:

“Can I experience attraction without allowing it to determine my behaviour?”

Those are two completely different goals.

The Trap of Fighting the Urge

When people desperately try to eliminate an urge, something interesting happens.

The urge becomes the centre of attention.

Every attractive stranger becomes a test.

Every intrusive thought becomes evidence that something is wrong.

Every temptation feels like an emergency.

Life slowly becomes organised around managing urges.

Ironically, this often strengthens them.

The struggle itself becomes part of the problem.

Acceptance Is Not Permission

This is where many people misunderstand acceptance.

Acceptance does not mean approving of infidelity.

It does not mean giving yourself permission to cheat.

Acceptance simply means making room for uncomfortable thoughts, feelings, and bodily sensations without treating them as commands.

“I notice attraction.”

“I notice excitement.”

“I notice guilt.”

“I notice the urge to send a message.”

None of these experiences force a behaviour.

They are experiences—not instructions.

A Different Kind of Pause

When urges arise, people often experience tunnel vision.

Their attention narrows until only one thing seems to exist.

The attractive person.

The excitement.

The fantasy.

The possibility.

Therapy creates a pause.

Not a pause to force yourself to be faithful.

Not a pause to prove your self-control.

Simply a pause to notice the whole picture.

“I notice excitement.”

“I notice fear.”

“I notice guilt.”

“I notice that I care deeply about my partner.”

“I notice the kind of person I want to become.”

From that wider perspective, behaviour is no longer completely automatic.

There is no passing or failing this exercise.

The goal is simply to weaken the automatic link between urge and action.

That pause can happen before sending a message.

While chatting online.

Before agreeing to meet.

Even during a date.

At any point in the behavioural chain, awareness creates the possibility of choice.

Living According to Values, Not Urges

People often tell me,

“I’m trying not to have these urges.”

I understand why.

But perhaps there is a more helpful goal.

Instead of asking,

“How do I stop wanting this?”

Try asking,

“What kind of partner do I want to be, even while these urges are present?”

That question changes everything.

Instead of living in constant battle with your own mind, you begin living toward something that matters.

Faithfulness becomes more than the absence of temptation.

It becomes the repeated practice of choosing your values in the presence of temptation.

The Real Freedom

Freedom is not reaching the point where unwanted thoughts never appear.

Freedom is discovering that they no longer have the final say.

Just as courage is not the absence of fear but moving forward despite fear, faithfulness is not the absence of attraction but repeatedly choosing the relationship you want to build despite attraction.

The person with elevator phobia does not wait for fear to disappear before entering the elevator.

Likewise, someone struggling with chronic infidelity may not have to wait for temptation to disappear before becoming the partner they aspire to be.

Real change begins the moment we stop asking our minds for permission to live according to our values.

Recovery doesn’t begin when the urges disappear. Recovery begins the moment you stop running from them.

If you or your relationship is struggling with repeated infidelity, One Life Only Counseling Services offers evidence-based counseling online and in person. Contact us at +63 917 886 5433 (LIFE) or info@onelifeonly.net to schedule an appointment.

If you wish to book online, please click here.

For books written by Nathan Chua under the pen name Starfly Chua, click here.

@onelifeonlycounseling

Chronic Infidelity: What if Your Urges Were Your Friend? What if the problem isn’t your urges? Many people trapped in repeated infidelity spend years fighting their thoughts and desires—only to feel even more trapped. A different path begins by learning to notice your urges without letting them decide your next move. Infidelity Relationships Cheating ACT AcceptanceAndCommitmentTherapy ContextualBehavioralScience Psychology MentalHealth CouplesTherapy RelationshipAdvice#fyp #foryou #counselingphilippines #onelifeonlycounseling #counseling #PsychologyVlog #ThinkDeeper

♬ original sound – One Life Only Counseling – One Life Only Counseling

Beyond Good or Bad: Looking at Context

In counseling, I do my best to avoid labeling my clients’ behaviors as good or bad, right or wrong. Instead, I ask a different question: In this particular situation, is this behavior helping the person move toward the aspirations they have for their lives, or is it getting in the way?

Is Love a Feeling?

Some people stay in relationships long after they have stopped asking whether a meaningful life can be built there.
Others leave at the first sign of difficulty, assuming that the absence of excitement means love has ended.
Love requires effort.
But effort cannot make every relationship workable.
And the loss of butterflies does not mean a relationship is unworkable.
The challenge is learning the difference.

Is Love Blind?

We readily acknowledge chemistry on a first date because little is at stake.

But when the stakes become higher, we often stop asking whether a relationship is workable and start asking how to make it work at any cost.

Love requires effort.

But effort alone cannot turn every context into one where a meaningful life can be built.

Pain vs. Suffering

by Nathan Chua

There’s an old aphorism that goes, “Pain is inevitable, suffering is optional,” credited to Japanese writer, Haruki Murakami.*  Have you seen a kid who was disappointed by a parent or primary caretaker who wasn’t as appreciative of a pyramid of blocks it created, and then proceeds to wipe out the masterpiece with one quick stroke of an arm?  I do remember myself doing so but can’t remember what my creation was.  If we look closely, we as adults sometimes revert to this way of coping with the inevitable hard feelings or the pain we get in situations at home, at work, and at random moments in our days. 

I am here borrowing a series of questions you might ask yourself when faced with a challenging moment in these situations.  This can help you see if you may be causing more pain on top of what is already an emotionally difficult moment.  I borrowed this from a book written by experts in functional analytic psychotherapy.**

  • In that situation, can you notice what it is that you do in reaction to it?  
  • If another person is involved, what do they do in response to your reaction?
  • What do you think it is that you do that aggravates or contributes to the problem?
  • Did the way you reacted show up in other places or with other people?
  • What is immediately rewarding about what you do?
  • What is it costing you in the short term?
  • What do you foresee will happen if you continue doing what you’re doing in the long run?
  • What would happen if you stopped doing what you’re doing now?  What would you have to be willing to accept?
  • Is there a purpose important enough for you to accept or face that?

In your relationships with your partner or your family:

When people in close relationships fight, there’s usually a reason for such behaviors.  Very often life’s stressors provide enough of a catalyst for differences and emotional sensitivities to be highlighted.  Couples and parents often believe that their partners or children need to be exactly just like them.  There is a tendency to believe that what is evident to one should be evident to the other.  There is nothing wrong with these thoughts for that is a typical function of our minds.  We compare and find out what should or should not be the same.  However, in your attempts to change the other, what results do you notice you get?  And if you didn’t do this, maybe you would have to accept that you and your kid or your spouse are different from you.  Now is there a purpose here for which you would be willing to accept that?        

In your relationships at work

Just like in other areas in your life, change happens at work.  Let’s take for example your boss.  We all hope that we have only one boss who happens to like us and the way we work, usually for life!  Unfortunately, that is not, most of the time, under our control.  Many decisions from within the hierarchical structure are handed down from above.  So ask yourself the questions posed above.  Let’s say you end up consuming hours contemplating how bad things have been since your company had a change of management.  You may notice that there are short term costs involved in this behavior, like procrastinating on your work tasks.  In the long term, such a habit can only lead up to you losing your job or getting bad marks on your performance.  Would you be willing to accept the fact that companies change and at times your boss will frustrate or be different from you?  What would be reason enough for you to accept this reality?  Is it the family that you love and care about who depend on your job to sustain their needs or even lifestyles?  Is it that long wished for vacation that you planned to spend with loved ones?          

At random moments    

You and I know that driving in a megapolis like Metro Manila can be rather challenging.  Anger and frustration are easy to come by when you have to contend with multiple threats to your peaceful drive home.  When you yell and scream inside your vehicle while your kids and partner are with you, what do you notice are the payoffs and both short and long term negative consequences?  Has it gotten in the way of an otherwise happy ride home?  Would you have to accept that at times driving in an overcrowded city can be challenging?  Is your drive home important enough of a reason for you to hold your peace?  

There you go my friends.  Hope these examples will give you a snippet of what you can learn from what the experts have painstakingly worked to provide us with, which is the knowledge that we are not free from life’s pains, but we are free to choose how we respond to them.  Will we follow old rules of thumb that have both long and short term costs to what otherwise are things we most cherish about our jobs and relationships?  Or will we stop and take a step back and see from a distance what we can do differently to avert the costs and live well in the moment?

*https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/613585-pain-is-inevitable-suffering-is-optional-say-you-re-running-and

**FAP Made Simple by Holman, Kanter, Tsai, Kohlenberg

Are you in a mixed or mixed-race relationship?

by Nathan Chua

It is hard enough being married, it can be even more frustrating when you and your spouse or partner grew up in completely different environments and cultures.  If you’re like most couples I know, a big part of the decision to get married is laced with dreams of unbounded passion and caring that will never end.  Well, if you’re over that part, you’re part of the majority.  In other words, it’s just what to expect when you have spent enough time together.  The passion dies out and it’s time to grow up and take your relationship beyond infatuation.    

A quick look at the definition of a mixed marriage is one where the parties involved are of different racial or religious backgrounds.  It’s quite often that the couples I see with this type of configuration will both tell me about how shocked they are to discover how different their perspectives are.  One partner may perceive the other as being too direct or harsh with their conversations, while the other feels that it is healthy to be direct.  One may follow certain customs that for the other spouse is completely unnecessary and wasteful.

Most of the time, I see couples bogged down with content.  The arguments remain on the surface.  These can come in the form of who did what first, or if you didn’t do this, I would have done this rather than do what I just did.  You can just imagine how tiring this cycle can be.  You and your partner or spouse end up lawyering for yourselves.  You have become unbudgeable and are feeling major contempt for your partner. 

It is hard and I recognize that.  Nothing could be more true than to say that these differences can turn out to be stinkers in your relationship.  You’ve made a turn to a section on the road to that paradise where you seem to be stuck in an arid desert. 

There is a way though for you and your spouse to find ways to grow in your relationship with these differences.  The key is to see that you have started to conceive of these differences as defects.  They’ve gone through the math, there is no way you can marry someone who is compatible with you.  In fact, the probability that you end up with someone incompatible is, guess what?  One hundred percent!

Metaphor:

One thing I really like about what I have learned in my approaches to individual as well as couples therapy, is the use of metaphors in my work.  One metaphor that I find extremely useful in my personal life is the metaphor of the blind or injured friend.  Now let’s suppose that you had a friend you love who you go out jogging with every weekend.  Unfortunately, that friend of yours suffered an injury one day and then could not jog as fast as you do anymore or keep the usual pace you had when he was still without injury.  Would you expect your friend to run just the same way he did as before the injury?  Would you slow down for your friend to keep pace, so at the same time you are doing this activity together, you can do the usual chatting you’re used to?

If you are like most people I know, you would.  Why?  Because you love your friend that much.   

One last thing, when you do such a thing with your friend, or in this case your spouse, try looking through their eyes and see what’s behind them.  Maybe you will see a reflection of the person you want to be towards someone you vowed to love and care for.  It’s hard yet fulfilling, because you probably saw that in someone else who inspired you to do so in the past.  Someone who was willing to give you a hand when you needed it.  Maybe that someone who cared is now who you see as a reflection in those eyes that smile back at you and say they love you and appreciate your love.  Relish and be mindful of those moments.  Maybe they are what will put meaning and purpose in your mixed relationship.

Listen to this blogpost on Spotify!  Click here!